Farmer Suicides: A First-hand Report from Karnataka

January 16, 2012

By Kaveri Rajaram Indira. This article was first published in

In Tumkur district of Karnataka (close to the state capital – Bangalore), a spate of 10 peasant suicides in the year 2011 has prompted some alarm over an issue affecting millions more peasants who are still alive and struggling. A group of us, that included six people in all, traveled to visit each of these families to understand the root causes of these suicides.

The peasant families that we met typically had farm holdings consisting of a few acres of dry, rain-fed land. No one could afford irrigation facilities and these were clearly not being provided by the state. The main crop being grown were peanuts, and all the farmers stated that their crop had failed for the last few years. The main cause, they felt, was the drying up of existing water sources. Wells were drying up, the rains were getting sparser than before. When they tried going deeper they were only getting water with high fluoride content, which destroyed the fertility of their farms. Many of them had spent tens of thousands of rupees digging bore wells which failed, incurring huge debts as a result.

In some cases, the farmers were also being cheated in an ingenious way by multinational companies growing Gherkins. These companies covered all input costs, but compensated farmers for their labor in an arbitrary manner, based on claims that the Gherkins they grew were not up to their standards of size or shape. Since Gherkins are not consumed locally, they were at the mercy of the companies as their sole consumer and were bound to accept whatever sale price the companies fixed.

Every one of the families we visited said that the only worry of the family member who committed suicide was the crushing debt they had incurred and tension over repaying them. Some families even showed suicide notes as clear proof of this fact. Debts had piled up over five main issues: failure of crop due to irregular rains and a lack of irrigation facilities – leading to the loss of half a lakh (Rs. 50,000) on input costs; digging bore wells to compensate those that failed, each costing another half a lakh of rupees; crushing costs of health-care for major secondary and tertiary treatment; the costs of privatized higher education of children, especially male children, as an investment towards eventually making the kind of money that could possibly pay off their debts; and, tragically, the costs of marriage borne by the parents of female children, also amounting to about half a lakh. In one case, the debts were incurred over the payment of upto Rs. 30,000 over the years for religious yathras organized locally. The debts were incurred from banks, from consortium’s of merchants referred to as ‘mandi loans’, various ‘stree shakti’ type womens’ Micro finance- self-help groups, and ‘hand loans’ or personal loans from local rich farmers and relatives. All these loans carried compounding interest, which broke the confidence of the peasants who took the extreme step of committing suicide

The families’ demands to the government are mostly a job for a family member. The families have received no compensation for the loss of their family member. The situation which these farmers find themselves is based fundamentally on the destruction of farming as a means of livelihood, based on the depletion of natural water sources and the takeover of cash crop farming by predatory corporations. The government’s response, as usual, apart from not even meeting the immediate needs of the grieving family, is even more far removed from addressing immediate major concerns in agriculture today, such as reforming the system of water use and agricultural support to farmers, in addition to addressing the livelihood and compensation concerns of individual peasants.


3 Responses to “Farmer Suicides: A First-hand Report from Karnataka”

  1. yacoob Says:
    April 25th, 2012 at 01:24

    Any ways we can help these poor farmers?

  2. Gopinath Koneti Says:
    May 25th, 2012 at 00:27

    Let us understand these issues one by one. Answering the simple to complex issues. The author did not mention about the literacy levels of these farmers.

    1. Farmers, when they are illiterate, are bound to succumb to more social pressures and prestige issues.

    2. Financial Literacy is more important in such cases as it helps them to understand the importance or dangers of debt.

    3. It is not clear whether crop failure has resulted in partial of total damage of the crop.

    4. There is no reason why one should go to the extreme step of suicide if the farmers are empowered with suitable knowledge. Empowerment hardly comes from Govt institutions. People like you and me need to talk to these farmers and help them in finding solutions that can avoid taking debts.

    5. Small check dams or plastic lined ponds in one acre of rainfed farm can ensure irrigation for the crop.

  3. Gopinath Koneti Says:
    May 25th, 2012 at 00:36

    Adding to the above,

    1. Gherkins cultivation is resource intensive and more often, linked to the export specifications.

    2. Farmers have a choice to not to adopt gherkin cultivation if they found it uneconomical. So I do not see clear reason why they should blame any gherkin companies. There were instances when gherkin farmers have sold the crop to a competing company. So these are demand supply equations that could exist in any economy. Farmer suicides are much larger issues and let us not compare it with them.

Leave a comment